Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/customer/www/ on line 2222
idiotsheet » Blog Archive DYLAN WINS PULITZER CITATION - idiotsheet


By Gabriel Thy • Art Theory • 8 Apr 2008


SURE, IT’S JUST ANOTHER award ceremony, but surely they mean more to you than those you were battling as a kid (I’m thinking of the Tom Paine Award, an awkward event for everyone involved it seems). I hope so because you sure are winning lots of prizes these days. The Grammys come to mind. Now we’ve hearing that a 2008 Special Citation has been awarded to you by the Pultizer Prize Foundation for his profound impact on popular music and American culture, marked by lyrical compositions of extraordinary poetic power.

So very true. Without changing gears, some of us survivors of the current phase of man will surely be breathing the air around Bob Dylan for a few hundred years, God willing. Still no word from the Nobel Committee, where Dylan was first nominated for the prize in literature in 1997. So let us pilfer and pillage through the ironies of time to get a beat on what’s happening with this Nobel crowd.

While many music critics agree that Dylan is among the most profound songwriters in modern music, his repeated nomination for the Nobel Prize has raised a vexing question among literary authorities: Should song lyrics ever qualify for literature’s most prestigious award? Christopher Ricks, co-director of the Editorial Institute at Boston University—and an avid Dylan fan who has written scholarly papers on the songwriter’s work—said the question is “tricky.”

“I don’t think there’s anybody that uses words better than he does,” said Ricks, the author of highly regarded works of literary criticism such as “The Force of Poetry” and “Allusion to the Poets,” as well as books on T.S. Eliot, Lord Alfred Tennyson and John Keats.

“But I think his is an art of a mixed medium,” Ricks said. “I think the question would not be whether he deserves (the Nobel Prize) as an honor to his art. The question would be whether his art can be described as literature.”

It definitely can, said Gordon Ball, an author and literature professor at the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, VA— who has nominated Dylan every year since 1996. “Poetry and music are linked,” Ball said. “And Dylan has helped strengthen that relationship, like the troubadours of old.”

The Nobel Prize in literature is given out annually by the 18 lifetime members of the 218-year-old Swedish Academy. Candidates can be nominated by members of other literary academies and institutions, literature professors and Nobel laureates. Each year, the Swedish Academy receives about 350 nominations for about 200 different candidates, which is narrowed down to about five finalists. The winner is announced in October. The finalists, except for the winner, are not revealed for 50 years.

Ball said he first nominated Dylan after the writer Allen Ginsberg urged him to do so. Ginsberg, a Beat poet whose literary circle included Jack Kerouac and Neal Cassady, nominated Dylan in 1996. “Dylan is a major American bard and minstrel of the 20th century” who deserves the award for his “mighty and universal powers,” Ginsberg wrote in his nomination letter, which Ball read to The Associated Press.

The literary value of Dylan’s texts are also supported by The Norton Introduction to Literature, a textbook used in American high schools and universities, which includes the lyrics to Dylan’s “Mr. Tambourine Man.” University of Virginia professor Alison Booth, who co-edited the anthology, said she doesn’t “have any trouble at all considering (Dylan) for a literary interpretation.”

“Literature has historically been defined very broadly,” Booth said. “I don’t think we’re testing some radical limits of literature by putting that in.” Several collections of Dylan’s lyrics have also been published as books. Still, most Nobel watchers say it’s unlikely the Swedish Academy—traditionally drawn to novelists and poets who are often out of the mainstream—will expand the scope of the prize to include songwriters.

“If so, it would be in a fit of marvelous free-mindedness,” said Svante Weyler, head of one of Sweden’s largest publishing houses, Norstedts. “It would be very surprising.”

But not entirely unprecedented.

In 1997, the prize went to Italian playwright Dario Fo, whose works also need to be performed to be fully appreciated, some say. And when Winston Churchill received it in 1953, for his historical and biographical writings, the academy also cited his “brilliant oratory” skills.

While the academy never discusses individual candidates, Carola Hermelin at the academy’s Nobel Library said songwriters are not excluded from the prize. “Song lyrics can be good poetry,” she said. “It depends on their literary quality.” But Weyler said he was skeptical about including songwriters. “Then you’re categorizing everything that includes words as literature,” he said. “Literature should not have to be read by the author for it to be good.”

Well, as usual, Dylan himself, put it best: They can talk about me plenty when I’m gone.

Not only have I collected and burned into my psyche nearly every song he has ever sung over the course of my lifetime I count myself as one of the fortunate fans to own one of 900 signed and framed lithographs of Dylan’s Self-Portrait, which was used as the cover of an album of the same name, seen here among my books, photographs, and other fine perishables celebrated by the flesh.

© 2008 – 2010, Gabriel Thy. All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Bad Behavior has blocked 338 access attempts in the last 7 days.

%d bloggers like this: