Art is not a bargain! Art is available to 5% of our human race at any [given] time. Leonardo da Vinci said it. Communists tried to make art public! Did not work. Andy Warhola even named his art POP art! Did not work either. Art belongs to the ones who deserve it, to the ones who are seeking it.
—Andrey Bogoslowsky, 2009
To paint images without the questioning the tools of meaning is to declare that painting is dead as a medium worth serious consideration in today’s terse political climate for the simple reason we find it is historically self-evident that the exertion of all important art is political in nature and in nurture. The idea that ALL art is political, is justified by the statement that all weapons are political). Thus a theorem is born. But just as a plastic knife pilfered from the sidebar at your local fast food joint is negligible politics, so are certain variations in the phalanx of art.
That painting is not dead as a medium for communicating the insights and travails peculiar to our own times while admitting that it may very well be classified as undead is a declaration of independence the revolutionary artist must express then sever from the petty crimes committed by those who prefer the spacious cult of idols and pedestrianism. This doesn’t mean that happy and beautiful, simple or whimsical pictures cannot or should not be acclaimed in some measure, but to note that one plus one equals two is not quite the same as submitting that negative b plus or minus the square root of b squared minus 4ac over 2a is a solution less formidable.
I admit, I have not reached a point in my own work where I can say I have mastered my stated objective (because failure is inevitable). But the struggle continues and is as reflexive as expressing wonder that it even rains in the afternoon at all anymore.